Donald Trump's rejection of Paris Climate Agreement
Why Donald Trump's rejection of Paris Climate Agreement is the nadir of his isolationist agenda
Donald
Trump's decision for the US to join the elite club — hitherto comprising only
Syria and Nicaragua — of countries rejecting the climate agreement has largely drawn negative reactions from all over the world.
Not that it mattered to the US president, who delivered a chest-thumping
address from the White House, and then took to social media for a bit more
thumping of his chest:
![]() |
| DONALD TRUMP (PRESIDENT OF USA) |
There's
nothing wrong per se with the sentiment expressed in the wording of
the tweet, although the idea of a demand for a 'level playing field' sitting
beside a call for America to be 'First' might appear slightly contradictory.
Very slightly, mind you. It's a closer look at the full text of Trump's address that is far
more instructive and brings to the fore a somewhat unsettling reality:
This is the zenith or nadir (depending on how you see it) of the US president's
isolationist agenda... well, so far at least. What's worse is that Trump's move
is already inspiring similar sentiments in other parts of the world, even as
the likes of Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron and the rest are trying
desperately to hold the agreement together. Eric Abetz, senator from Australia
— a country that relies on coal for around
three-quarters of its electricity — had the following to say shortly
after Trump's address: But back to Trump, and these few lines sum up the
president's longstanding strategy perfectly: China will be allowed to build
hundreds of additional coal plants. So we can’t build the plants, but they can,
according to this agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal
production by 2020. Think of it: India can double their coal production. We’re
supposed to get rid of ours. Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of
coal plants.In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just
transfers those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to
foreign countries. This agreement is less about the climate and more about
other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States. Ever
since he hit the campaign trail, Trump has played the fear-mongering card. His
method has differed subtly but significantly from the fear-mongering espoused by
George W Bush, who convinced the US that its way of life was under threat. In
the lead-up to the presidential election, Trump set about convincing
Middle America that its quality of life was under threat. As president,
the former real estate tycoon has carried the same card onto a grander stage:
Attempting to convince the US that its quality of life is under
threat.

Protesters
gather outside the White House to protest President Donald Trump's decision to
withdraw the Unites States from the Paris climate change accord. AP
And
in doing so, he is actively pushing the country on a more inward-looking path.
That this is the height of Trump's isolationism is evident in the fact that he
saw fit to walk out of a deal signed by 98.9 percent of the world's countries —
indicating the near-total global realisation that climate change is a very real
threat — to prevent other countries 'gaining a financial advantage' over the
US. Former president Barack Obama offered his views on the US exit from a deal his
administration had worked so hard to secure: A year and a half
ago, the world came together in Paris around the first-ever global agreement to
set the world on a low-carbon course and protect the world we leave to our
children. It was steady, principled American leadership on the world stage
that made that achievement possible... But even in the absence of American
leadership; even as this administration joins a small handful of nations that
reject the future; I’m confident that our states, cities, and businesses will
step up and do even more to lead the way, and help protect for future
generations the one planet we’ve got. This absence of American leadership,
as was noted by the previous commander-in-chief, has not gone unnoticed by
China. "A reckless withdrawal from the climate deal will waste
increasingly finite US diplomatic resources, and the US' selfishness and
irresponsibility will be made clear to the world, crippling the country's world
leadership," read a stinging op-ed in Global Times. Beijing has long been eyeing the role of
world leader, as was evident in the way President Xi Jinping emerged as a champion of globalisation at this year's
Davos Summit, stating, "Pursuing protectionism is like locking
oneself in a dark room." It's likely China anticipated what Trump would say
in his very loudly promoted address on the climate agreement.

Post a Comment